Technically Speaking…

‘¦ this statement may be accurate:

The letter also stated that Baker was ‘œnever in attendance in any party where any women were being used for prostitution purposes.’

What the letter specifically doesn’™t mention are any parties where men, boys or girls (insert your favorite congresscritters’™ choice of animal here) may have been used for prostitution purposes. [...]

Commentary By: sukabi

‘¦ this statement may be accurate:

The letter also stated that Baker was ‘œnever in attendance in any party where any women were being used for prostitution purposes.’

What the letter specifically doesn’™t mention are any parties where men, boys or girls (insert your favorite congresscritters’™ choice of animal here) may have been used for prostitution purposes. I’™d say the lawyer writing that letter is being a bit cute, wouldn’™t you?

Yes, I’™m beating the hooker scandal again. Fer christ’™s sake, if this is the one thing out of the millions of issues the repubs are responsible for that will get the media’™s attention, then so be it.

Sunday, April 30th, 2006 by Richard Blair |

No Comments

No comments yet.

Leave a comment

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI