Judicial Watch, a Conservative Group, Lists Their Most Corrupt Politicians

Most of them are Republicans, and the Democrats they include are somewhat bogus. Here’™s the link to the Judicial Watch site. RawStory does a good job of delineating that story. As RawStory notes, Judicial Watch is a highly partisan Republican site. As they also noticed, Judicial Watch included Barack Obama, and [...]

Commentary By: Steven Reynolds

Most of them are Republicans, and the Democrats they include are somewhat bogus. Here’™s the link to the Judicial Watch site. RawStory does a good job of delineating that story. As RawStory notes, Judicial Watch is a highly partisan Republican site. As they also noticed, Judicial Watch included Barack Obama, and also mispelled his name. Look closely and you’™ll notice that Judicial Watch corrected the spelling.

Hey, this isn’™t big news. Judicial Watch could not pretend to be legitimate if they didn’™t name Ney and Hastert and DeLay, etc. But they included some Democrats in that bogus strategy that’™s all over the MSM to keep things ‘œfair.’ (What a crock.) What’™s interesting is that the group went back and corrected the spelling of Barack Obama’™s name after RawStory posted the misspelling. What does that mean? This very Republican site is watching very closely the Democratic Blogzome and the reactions there, and they are reacting quickly.

We’™ve got more power than we think.

Thursday, December 28th, 2006 by Richard Blair |
Category: General

No Comments

No comments yet.

Leave a comment

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI