The Ron Paul (r)Evolution?
GOP presidential candidate Ron Paul placed third in the recent Texas GOP straw poll. Is he climbing the public opinion ladder, or do most people even care? Regardless, his supporters feel that the third place finish was a “net positive” for Paul’s campaign, and recent positive press seems to be energizing a grassroots effort on his behalf.
This week, cadaverous Fred Thompson (R-Law and Order™) is expected to finally pull the trigger and announce his candidacy for the GOP presidential nomination. I’m hopeful that, as he makes it official, other GOP candidates greet his entrance appropriately. Thompson isn’t exactly presidential timber, and there are rumors of a lot of skeletons rattling around in his closet that should be falling out into the public view in 3…2…1…
Bottom line - Thompson may be exiting the race a lot faster than he decided to get into it.
Quixotic candidate Ron Paul, on the other hand, continues to gather a bit of momentum and positive press. On Friday, Associated Press published a rather fluffy piece on Mr. Paul and his growing legion of libertarian GOP supporters:
Passengers on a plane leaving New York could see three words in 4-foot block letters painted on an East Village rooftop terrace as they ascended: GOOGLE RON PAUL. The entreaty to search the Internet for news of the Republican congressman from rural Texas is one of the more visible signs of enthusiasm from a do-it-yourself base of Web fans. Their support doesn’t show up in public opinion polls, but it’s unmatched among presidential candidates in its passion…
The supporters have an entrepreneurial drive and get their political news from Internet sources outside the mainstream media, especially blogs and news aggregators that rely on popular vote to determine news value.
That same spirit inspires them to canvass parade routes in 100-degree heat, argue campaign strategy in two-hour meetings or paint the roof of a Manhattan apartment building.
“To get your arms around everything and understand what is going on is really impossible to do,” Paul spokesman Jesse Benton said of supporters roaming the Web…
Then, on Saturday - let’s not forget it’s a holiday weekend here in the states - the Texas GOP held a presidential candidate straw poll. Voting was not open to just anyone who had the price of admission in their pocket (as was the recent straw poll in Iowa). The Texas GOP straw poll was only open to current and former state-level and federal-level GOP convention delegates. In other words, Bush’s base. How did Paul finish? Third, behind anti-immigrant jingoist Duncan Hunter and aforementioned Thompson.
On the face of it, a third place finish might not seem like such good news for Mr. Paul’s campaign. Digging a little deeper, though, reveals that it’s another energizing finish for his supporters. Let’s be realistic. Participants in this poll were die hard Republicans, and probably more to the point, die hard TEXAS Republicans. They are anti-immigration in the extreme, ergo one of the reasons that Hunter garnered so many votes:
…Hunter got 534 votes, or 41% of the vote. Former Sen. Fred Thompson of Tennessee, who is expected to announce his candidacy this week but was not at the event, came in second with 266 votes, or nearly 21%. Rep. Ron Paul of Texas came in third with 217 votes, or 17%.
Crowd support seemed split between Hunter and Paul, whose supporters waved signs and chanted his name throughout the day…
So, ok, the Texas GOP straw poll was not an indication of much of anything. While the Iowa straw poll could be honestly billed as a “beauty contest”, the Texas poll appears to have been little more than a gathering of anti-immigration GOP activists. Which, on the face of it, makes Paul’s showing even more impressive, considering his anti-war stance (Paul is anti-immigration, as well).
Here’s a sampling of reaction from his online supporters:
Ron Paul’s third place finish was a huge success considering the rules of the poll were designed specifically to prevent him from winning…
If you take into account the delegates who could not vote plus the exit poll results - Ron Paul won the Texas straw poll fair and square. What does that say about the GOP and mainstream media? I’ll be clear and blunt - They cannot be trusted at all.
Video from american freedom:
Ron Paul supporters turned away by fellow [Texas] Republicans. Apparently you have to be a neocon to be considered a true member of the Republican Party…
Sue Bob attends the straw poll (with video):
I went to Crawford two years ago to protest Cindy Sheehan. I, too, support Ron Paul and his views on the Iraq War. He believes that an undeclared war is unconstitutional…
I’ll continue following Ron Paul’s quixotic quest, if for no other reason than I really get into the people-powered dynamic that drives a presidential campaign such as his. Interestingly enough, back in the day I campaigned for both John Anderson and Paul Simon - both underdogs (one R, one D) who ran largely grassroots efforts, pre-world wide web. So, perhaps my personal history is why Mr. Paul’s campaign has captured my imagination (if not my vote).
And lastly, if you missed my previous Ron Paul blogging, here’s my disclaimer: I am not a Ron Paul supporter. The vast majority of his policies are completely counter to the progressive agenda (his anti-war stance aside). Plus, I simply would not vote for a GOP presidential candidate in 2008 under any circumstances.




Ron Paul’s positions are definitely “counter to the progressive agenda” which is to get more and more free stuff from the government. The main reason progressives are against the war is they want all that money to buy more and more free stuff from the government for them. Of course, that requires a lot of ruthless tax-collecting and hate-the-rich rhetoric and massive regulation of everyone and everything, so yes, Ron Paul is definitely “counter to the progressive agenda” since he champions liberty, property, and peace.
We must pave the way for a Ron Paul Victory: 6 Points toward the nomination
The Libertarian and libertarian-leaning conservative base is not big enough to get Ron Paul elected. We need to appeal to a broader spectrum of people.
1. We must split the neo-cons over Romney, Guiliani, Thompson and McCain
2. We must downgrade the conservative credentials of Romney, Guiliani, Thompson and RINO McCain. With Huckabee’s recent entrance into the “top-tier” candidates, he too must be exposed for his record of governance in Arkansas. We all know they’re fakes. Let every conservative you meet know this.
3. We must flood conservative talk radio with questions regarding Ron Paul.
4. We must convince neo-con leaning GOP’ers to vote on strong domestic policy rather than foreign policy. What matters more: what happens here or what happens half-way around the world?
5. We must tone down what is perceived as “blame-America first” rhetoric. This is turning off a lot of people in the right wing. The principle of blowback and a need for policy change around the world can be demonstrated in a perceivably more “pro-America” way. We must demonstrate the failure of interventionism while also confronting the failure of isolationism. We must definitively propagate non-interventionism, what our country has nearly always stood for. I have met many who believe Ron Paul to be an isolationist – even though this is certainly not the case.
Once we have won the GOP nomination, our focus must turn to the country. From here, we can woo the dissatisfied left and with this coalition, bring Ron Paul to Pennsylvania Ave.
6. We must attract the anti-war democrats who have lost faith in Nancy Pelosi and the rest of the democrats. Ron Paul is the only solution to the Iraq Problem
a. We must demonstrate to these voters that a vote for Kucinich is a vote wasted – he has no chance in the United States (we have never embraced socialism) and he did terribly last time around
Progressive Agenda -> Big Government -> Tyranny
Any questions?
Progressive Agenda -> Big Government -> Tyranny
NeoConservative Agenda -> Big Government -> Tyranny
Country before party = Ron Paul 2008.
The war-mongers who are desparate to stop Ron Paul are trying to convince others that peace and free trade are “isolationism”. As Lenin advised, “First, confuse the vocabulary.”