Coinkydinks? McCain Travels To Colombia; Hostages Freed
There are “coincidences”, and then there are true coinkydinks. Particularly in the political world. Does anyone find it the least bit interesting that on the day that John McCain embarks on a tour of Mexico and Colombia, that three American military contractors (among others) were “rescued” by the Colombian military?
While many of us revel in the patriotic excesses of the upcoming three day holiday weekend, John McCain is taking his Straight Talk Express tour to Mexico and Colombia. I’ve gotta tell you, ever since the itinerary of the tour was announced, I’ve been scratching my head a bit. It didn’t make any sense. Why would a U.S. presidential candidate feel the need to hobnob with the political elite in Mexico City and Bogota? And on a day that it was revealed that one of McCain’s biggest financial boosters had paid off right wing Colombian guerrillas over a long period of time?
Teh wierd, as the kids would say.
Let’s further tighten down the tinfoil hat for a moment. Earlier this afternoon, it was reported that several hostages who had been held since 2002 / 2003 time frame by a Colombian militant movement (one that’s associated, at least in the press, with Venezuela’s Hugo Chavez), had been freed. Among the hostages who were “liberated” by Colombian military forces was a former Colombian presidential candidate, and three American military contractors:
Former Colombian presidential candidate Ingrid Betancourt has been rescued, the country’s defense minister, Juan Manuel Santos, said Wednesday.
Betancourt, who is reportedly in severely deteriorating health, was kidnapped by the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia, known as FARC, in 2002.
Along with Betancourt, three Americans and 11 other hostages who were Colombian police were rescued from FARC…the freed include Americans Keith Stansell, Marc Gonsalves and Thomas Howes.
…Stansell, Gonsalves and Howes have been held since February 13, 2003, when their single-engine plane crashed in mountains south of Bogota. The Americans were working for Northrop Grumman Corp. as part of a U.S.-funded counternarcotics effort…
I know this doesn’t mean anything to most Americans, but: Northrup Grumman? U.S.-funded counternarco operation? What were three guys who work for a private American military contractor doing flying around Colombia in the first place? My goodness, there are some stories to be told.
But what’s most interesting in assessing this entire development is that it occurred, serendipitously I’m sure, at the same time that GOP candidate McCain is getting ready to fly into the country.
This is just too weird. And the coincidence is not lost on most of us who at least bother to follow this crap on a daily basis. The fix was in. Banana republic, indeed.
Note: I’m very pleased that these hostages have been released, and can be reunited with their families. But this smacks - literally smacks - of the hostage release in Iran on the day that Ronald Reagan was inaugurated. The entire operation, from McCain’s itinerary announced last week, through the actual hostage rescue operation, is just too damn coincidental.
Update: Al Giordano at Narconews has the latest (and best) takedown of the faux “rescue mission”. The photo at the top of his post is worth the price of clicking through.
Update, 7/4 This whole affair is starting to stink like yesterday’s diapers. From Forbes:
…The 15 hostages released on Wednesday by the Colombian army ‘were in reality ransomed for a high price, and the whole operation afterwards was a set-up,’ the radio’s French-language channel said.
Saying the United States, which had three of its citizens among those freed, was behind the deal, it put the price of the ransom at some $20 million…
So, that’s the price of publicity these days? Paying off a terrorist organization?




To paraphrase an old aphorism:
One time is happenstance
Two times is coincidence
Three times is the Bushies pulling their usual crap
I think the whole thing was a photo op so that McCain could look strong. Same reason why the story ( real or not ) about him manhandling one of these guys in the 80’s came out. Because the Neo-cons like the idea of him looking like a hot head.
It looks like you’re not far off the mark, Rick, even if you do wear a tin foil hat, as Digby says.
http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/mccain-says-he-knew-of-colombia-rescue-attempt-2008-07-02.html
Stinks too high heaven. You just know that McCain had to have inside info on the release of these folks.
My first thought was of the Reagan inauguration and the “coincidence” of the Iranian hostages being released. Gotta understand, though, that most Americans consider history in increments of 4 or 8 years, i.e., presidential elections/administrations. So if something happened over 12 years ago, it doesn’t matter.
Gut reaction? This isn’t going to play that big. It may be a manufactured thing, probably helped by United Fruit sources, people who have already been indicted. But South America will not hit that big in this election.
Calm down, everyone. Dirty tricks it may be, but the timing is off for a big dirty trick.
did THIS mean anything to anyone else? for me, it set off an alarm, of sorts:
… [Ms Betancourt] thanked Mr Uribe, against whom she was running as a presidential candidate when she was kidnapped, and said he “has been a very good president”.
She added: “I continue to aspire to serve Colombia as president.”
…
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/7487026.stm
um… you don’t think… could it be? … only a coincidence?
COULD uribe & benefactors have had ms.betancourt removed for a time? eh?
I do not by nature tend to be paranoid, not even on teh weed. But, I am not stupid either (though some will disagree, most of my better friends) and I am ancient enough to recall St Ronnie’s inaugural present from the mullahs. Coincidence, nah…it just pointed out how right the land was to elect such a grand new leader and expose Carter for the “malaise.”
I’m also old enough to recall Nixon’s and Kissinger’s sub rosa agreement with the Viet Cong negotiators to delay the start of peace negotiations until after the election in 1968. I guess the short answer is that if it’s too neat and convenient, and too good to be counted as anything but kabuki, one must turn over the rock and see who’s hiding under it.
Wow — you called this one in a big way, Rick. Well done.