It’s A Mad, Mad, Mad Country We Live In
While Americans watch their economic security evaporate, the McCain campaign has chosen a strategy designed to foment false fears. I suspect history will note this as the moment when the irascible McCain, in the midst of crisis, chose ambition over honor and insured his irrelevance.
There are times when I’m sure the United States won’t survive the remaining days until we elect our next president…let alone the day after. As I watch the McCain campaign succumb to increasingly divisive acts of desperation…fomenting fear and animosity by directing innuendo at ignorance…I can’t help but question the recklessness of his ambition.
If the role of leadership is to advance our society, then political appeals predicated upon a least common denominator equation are an affront to that objective. Frankly, it’s difficult to blame those voters who are vulnerable to gutter politics as a result of generational prejudices, isolation from mitigating influences, and limited educational opportunities. Notwithstanding, there is great danger in inciting those who lack the tools to make objective conclusions.
Those who willfully engage in this kind of misdirection are little more than manipulative opportunists who must be exposed and rejected. Dividing this nation to advance one’s ego is an admission that the advancement of the ego supersedes the enlightenment of the electorate.
To understand the risks of tactical cynicism, take a look at the following two videos. The first is the latest McCain campaign ad. The second is from a recent rally supporting the McCain-Palin ticket.
I think this third video amplifies my argument and points to another underlying issue. With a number of these voters, the McCain strategy is designed to allow them to unleash racist hatred under the guise of a new label. One can easily see how a term like “terrorist” is now being substituted for “n*****”…a term they realize would draw even more outrage and accusations of blatant bigotry. This cynical ploy is despicable!
While watching the second video, it’s easy to feel outrage at the individuals espousing uninformed opinions. However, if one takes the time to consider the construction of their conclusions (see the first video), it’s clear that they are being intentionally misled. The fact that they can creates an opening for those who would put the pursuit of power and profit first. The more fear the McCain campaign can invoke, the less likely rationality and reasonability can be restored. This is the dilemma we face.
Sadly, the fact that fear can still succeed in trumping the economic self-interest of these individuals is disheartening. In the end, those who frame this election as a battle between good and evil appear to be the ones planting the unsubstantiated seeds of the evil they callously erect in order to oppose.
The only plausible cure for this brand of politics is to deliver a crushing electoral defeat to those who have chosen this course of action. Only then will there be a deterrent to the politics of distortion and deception. Should this happen, perhaps future elections can focus on real issues of import to average Americans. For voters to be receptive to reconsideration, the cynicism of their leaders must be exposed and exterminated.
Frankly, if our increasingly dubious economic situation isn’t sufficient to force us to see through these absurd distractions, it may require even more suffering for us to discern rhetoric from reality. It seems to me that some of the people we see in the above video have become so removed from rationality that unless and until Barack Obama personally hands them a loaf of bread and a bowl of soup, they’ll hold fast to the fabrications they’ve been fed by the McCain campaign.
Unfortunately history tells us that extremist ideation is often most influential when economic turmoil prevails. It is even more ominous when some leaders choose to intentionally exacerbate it by linking the societies financial difficulties to cultural and moral considerations. In times of tumult, there is always the risk that some people in positions of power will see scapegoating as the path to power.
Two years ago, when I suggested the housing bubble fiasco would exponentially eclipse the S&L scandal, there were many who called me a partisan alarmist. Two months ago, despite repeated assurances to the contrary from those in power, the dominos began to fall in rapid succession…exactly as I’d predicted. While the toll is just beginning to be tallied, the damage has been done and it will be huge.
Today, I’m going to offer another prediction…not because I want it to materialize…but because history instructs us to do so lest we find ourselves repeating the same mistakes over and over again. This nation is on a trajectory for tragedy. In our unwillingness to face facts and find common ground, we are laying the groundwork for vilification, violence, and victimization.
When evil opportunists identify the emergence of this dynamic, they are drawn to exploit it for power and profit. Unless the forces for good intervene quickly to derail this downward spiral, we’ll eventually find ourselves quantifying the coming calamity in corpses. Soon after, we’ll utter the words that history tells us so often follow these days of darkness, “Never again, never again.”
I hope history will conclude that my voice was one of many who sought to sound the alarm in advance. If doing so now makes me a pessimist, I’ll glady accept the attachment of that label if my warning can contribute to transforming a looming tragedy into an historic high point at which the human spirit was able to choose good and extinguish an emerging evil…without the needless shedding of blood. Only then will we have fulfilled our prior promise of, “Never again, never again.”
On that rather gloomy note, I’ll turn to sarcasm and snark as it is often the only means to escape the unease such speculations unleash. It also offers an alternate means to expose essence. The following list is offered to illuminate the absurdity of the rhetoric being employed at recent Republican rallies.
Top ten signs you’re un-American and have connections with known radicals and terrorists:
Number Ten:
Are you in the habit of purchasing Café Lattes from Starbucks? In a McCain administration, it will be assumed you supported the socialist ideology of the French revolution.
Number Nine:
Check you’re children’s toys; the McCain campaign is suggesting parents who purchase Chinese toys are indoctrinating them into communism.
Number Eight:
Are you attending independent foreign films? If so, it won’t be advisable under a McCain presidency unless they’re Canadian (but not French Canadian…only the provinces that share an “international” border with Alaska are acceptable).
Number Seven:
Better check that passport…if you’ve been to Venezuela, you’re a Hugo Chavez sympathizer and subject to airport detention under the Super Duper Patriot Act proposed by John McCain.
Number Six:
Are you a gay man living in the Castro in San Francisco? If so, a McCain administration will view you as a subversive militant homosexual with strong ties to Cuba. How about a ticket to Guantanamo?
Number Five:
Think of yourself as Joe Six Pack? Better not be drinking German beers like Becks unless you want to be placed on the McCain-Palin list of Neo-Nazi Holocaust deniers.
Number Four:
Are you receiving your education from a prestigious east coast university? Might want to reconsider attending North Idaho College, Matanuska-Sustina College, or the University of Idaho. Sarah Palin’s vice presidential platform includes rooting out those doggone un-American elites.
Number Three:
It’s all about proper pronunciation…unless you drop the “G” from the end of at least one word in a sentence, the McCain campaign might think you’re a freakin’ for’ner.
Number Two:
Watch those middle names for male children. It’s far better to choose a girl’s name (Sydney’s nice, eh?) than one associated with a deposed dictator. However, if you do choose a girl’s name, that male child must never be allowed to visit San Francisco (see number six).
Number One:
Palin etiquette, Palin etiquette! They’re pumps; not stilettos. Everyone knows a truly liberated American woman attaches a stiletto to a rifle…while wearing six-inch pumps. The moustache is optional.




I was born and raised in Strongsville, OH, the city where that video came from. Strongsville is full of middle-to-upper class white people. It’s also a city that always votes Republican on everything, despite being in the heavily Democratic Cuyahoga County.
And don’t be fooled, there is a ton of racism among the people there.
Daniel, that gal in the second video is likely a plant… she was one of those very vocal “If I can’t vote for Hillary I’m voting for McCain” women…. and now she’s showing up at the McCain rallies spouting the kind of crap she is… she’s likely being paid to agitate … If you’ll notice there is a guy that shows up to tell her to answer only the questions she’s asked and then drifts off screen…
crap, forgot to give a link to the Clinton / McCain woman…
sukabi,
No doubt you could be right, but that needn’t nullify the application of my argument to her and her motivations. Surely a number of Clinton supporters, who would vote for McCain over Obama despite the actual issues of import, are apt to harbor some of the same underlying traits and animosities…especially if race is a factor.
My own mother traveled that path for a while until she was forced to reconsider. Unfortunately, many voters aren’t open to that process and the politicians who reinforce this irrational behavior only exacerbate the problem and its persistence.
Regards,
Daniel
P.S. The third video underscores my contention and the sheer number of angry outbursts could never be attributed solely to angry Clinton supporters.
Daniel,
I’m not disagreeing with anything you posted… just that the McCain “team” is purposely digging for the deep-seated anger to stir up their crowds… and since the first couple of the angrier “rallies” have made the news they likely won’t have to pay agitators since they’ve (McCain / Palin) signaled that it’s OK with them to call Obama a terrorist or whatever and have condoned - by their silence and continued incitement - the threats against him… they’ve successfully released the hounds
There have already been instances of vandalism against Obama supporters across the country (most of them have been minor — so far) but I don’t think that will be the case much longer…
Oh and Daniel, I don’t think the very vocal, but tiny group of Hillary for McCain supporters were anything BUT a Republican plant group… sure there may have been a couple of them (Lady Whatshername comes to mind… but she’s in a social class that would have likely voted Repub) but to go ape shit crazy over McCain / Palin ??? I don’t think so… unless it’s purely a “race” issue for them…
Interesting. What about McCain’s friendship with G. Gordon Liddy, who has admitted in his autobiography to plotting the murder of several people, never mind his Watergate conviction. Or what about his friendship with Charles Keating. Or what about McCain being on the advisory board of the U.S. Council for World Freedom which was associated with the death squads in Latin America. Then there’s that convicted felon who McCain said was a role model for young Americans. It happens to be McCain’s father in law who used mob ties to get his business started. http://straighttalkonmccain.blogspot.com/